Shutter Island…Did It Deserve More Credit?
Posted: November 19, 2010 Filed under: Film Reviews | Tags: Arts, Elias Koteas, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Martin Scorsese, Movies, Patricia Clarkson, Shutter Island Leave a comment »As one of my favourite films of the year, Director Martin Scorsese, has crafted a beautiful psychological thriller. If you haven’t read the book then Shutter Island will certainly surprise you. It Follows Federal Marshall Teddy Daniels, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, with his partner Chuck Aule, acted out by Mark Ruffalo. The two have been sent on a mission to investigate a mental institute for the criminally insane on a remote island, to look for a missing patient who has impossibly left her prison block, called Rachel Solando (Patricia Clarkson). You soon learn nothing is what it seems. As the plot moves on, it is mostly focused on Teddy Daniels, who has personal problems of his own. He has his own agenda; he believes that illegal experiments are being carried out on the island, and is trying his best to find out where it is happening. He also wants to find a man, Andrew Laeddis (Elias Koteas) for his past crimes.
The story of the film moves quite slowly but not necessarily in a bad way. The film often tries to give you subtle hints as to what the whole film is about. I for one didn’t get the subtle hints, which I’m glad about, because I was shocked in the end. But maybe you can, unless you’ve read the book of course, so don’t be smug. The film also slowly moves to a faster pace really nicely, moving from standstill, to moving slow, to moving fast, but the transition between the three is so smooth that you barely notice it.
The acting in this film is almost perfect. You’d have to nit pick to find anything wrong. DiCaprio once again proves to us the great actor that he really is, and gives an award-worthy performance. I have a confession actually, I didn’t rate him as an actor a few years ago, and I’m quite ashamed about that, because he has been one of the best actors on screen this year.
My biggest concern is that the film made its money, but it didn’t get the credit it deserves. As well as Inception, this is another film that is in the top 10 this year. I don’t understand why it didn’t get the attention it should have received; maybe it wasn’t marketed as well, or maybe a bigger film was out at the time, either way it’s a shame really. Oh well, just like other reviews it gets a good rating from me aswell.
4.8/5
By Daniel Hart
Related Articles
- Shutter Island (mrmovietimes.com)
- Martin Scorsese | No 20 | Film Power 100 (guardian.co.uk)
- 10 Things You Didn’t Know about Leonardo DiCaprio (bettyconfidential.com)
- /Film LA: Scorsese/DiCaprio Retrospective, Live Donnie Darko Commentary, Four Lions, Darren Bousman’s Abattoir, Elm Street (slashfilm.com)
The UK Film Industry Needs To Be More Inventive
Posted: November 19, 2010 Filed under: Film Reviews | Tags: Daniel Radcliffe, Film, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, HarryPotter, ITV, James Cameron, JK Rowling, United States Leave a comment »Director James Cameron is right, the UK needs more films like ‘Harry Potter’; imagine a teenager in America when he thinks of films related to the UK – what would come to his head? Harry Potter. But that is not a good thing. We don’t have many JK Rowling’s writing books that would be perfect on the big screen, do we? I am not annoyed that as a society we turn to America to watch most films, as I do it as well, as the American film industry has way more money and it’s well, better. The quality shows. You watch a horror film from the UK, low budget and cheesy. But America? Good quality and scary. The maths also says it all - America makes the highest grossing films in the world.
The problem has nothing to do with the quality of acting, in fact we are probably just as good in the drama aspect. I mean, the dramas we produce on ITV, lets say, are up there as the best. Our TV shows don’t need to be improved as much, well apart from TV series, because like films, the best TV programmes come from across the ocean.
So what is the problem.. Poor directors? Not enough film budget? Not enough original ideas? Well whatever it may be, it needs to be sorted, not because I am tired of poor UK films, but because our reputation is at stake. Music seems to keep up with America, so it puzzles me as to why the same doesn’t apply to films. Whilst Harry Potter carries the torch maybe this will be the start of good quality and box office busting films. You think? I can’t see that happening… but we’re in luck! JK Rowling is tempted to extend the Harry Potter series.
We seem to try and compete with American films aimed at teenagers. America brings out Step up, we bring out StreetDance 3D. But how is that even a competition? Where’s our Avatar? Where’s our Inception? I think it’s solely to do with budget, and if that is the case, the government need to make more effort and inject cash into the industry.
By Daniel Hart

